Logical Conclusions – Events in the past:
Remember that “must” is a modal. “Must”
followed be the verb word have and a participle expresses a logical conclusion based
on evidence. The conclusion is about an event that happened in the past.
Remember that an observation in the present may serve as the
basis for a conclusion about something that happened in the past. For example, “Here
is a message on my desk.” It may be conclusion that “My friend must have called
last night.”
Examples:
1.
Incorrect: The streets are wet; it should have
rained last night.
Correct: The streets are wet; it must have
rained last night.
2.
Incorrect: This pen won’t write; it can have run
out of ink (in the past).
Correct: This pen won’t write; it must have
run out of ink (in the past).
3.
Incorrect: The ring that I was looking at is
gone; someone else must buy it.
Correct: The ring that I was looking at is
gone; someone else must have bought it.
4.
Incorrect: He does not have his keys; he must
locked them in his car.
Correct: He does not have his keys; he must
have locked them in his car.
5.
Incorrect: I don’t see Martha anywhere; she must
be left early.
Correct: I don’t see Martha anywhere; she must
have left early.
6.
Incorrect: The theory of continental Drift
assumes that there must long-term climate
changes in many areas during the
past.
Correct: The theory of continental Drift assumes
that there must have been long-term
climate changes in many areas during the
past.
7.
Incorrect: When the weather becomes colder we
know that air mass must originated in
the Arctic rather than over the Gulf of
Mexico.
Correct: When the weather becomes colder we
know that air mass must have originated
in the Arctic rather than over the Gulf
of Mexico
English Grammar
Reviewed by LEARNING.COM
on
March 11, 2018
Rating:
No comments:
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.